KONTRIBUSI RANTAI NILAI TERHADAP PENINGKATAN DAYA SAING PERIKANAN TUNA DI KABUPATEN CILACAP DAN SEKITARNYA

Bambang Nariyono, Arief Daryanto, M Firdaus, Setijadi Johar

Abstract


Indonesia dalam industri tuna sangat diperhitungkan karena posisinya sebagai pemasok lebih dari 15 % produksi tuna dunia, tetapi di sisi lain daya saing perikanan tuna masih rendah. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menganalisis kontribusi rantai nilai perikanan tuna terhadap daya saing industri perikanan tuna di Kabupaten Cilacap. Penelitian dilaksanakan pasa bulan April sampai dengan September 2017. Hasil analisis Second Order Structural Equation Modeling didapatkan bahwa rantai nilai berpengaruh terhadap daya saing industri tuna dengan loading factor 0.540 dan nilai p yang signifikan. Pengujian terhadap model secara simultan terbukti bahwa model telah fit dengan telah dipenuhinya semua ukuran fitting model yang diindikasikan dengan nilai Chi-Square kecil yaitu 301.252, RMSEA = 0.072, GFI = 0.907, CFI= 0.923, dan CMIN/DF = 1.814. Temuan penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa rantai nilai mempunyai pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap daya saing industri tuna. Dengan demikian strategi yang tepat untuk memperkuat daya saing industri tuna dapat dilakukan dengan cara meningkatkan rantai nilai perikanan tuna terutama dari aspek operasional, outbond logistic, dan services.

Indonesia is the world’s larget tuna produser with contributing 15 percent to the world tuna market. However, the competitiveness of tuna fishery is still low. The aim of this research is to analyze the contribution of value chain of tuna fishery toward competitiveness of tuna industry in Cilacap. The study was conducted from April to September 2017. The results of analysis using using second order Structural Equation Modeling method (SEM) found that the value chain influenced the competitiveness of tuna industry with loading factor of 0.540 and significant p value. Tests on the model simultaneously proved that the model has been fit with the fulfillment of all fittings of the model. It gives indication with variables value, such as : Value of Chi-square is low with value 301.252; 0.072 for Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA); 0.907 for Goodness Fit Index (GFI); 0.907 for (CFI); and 1.814 for minimum discrepancy (CMIN/DF). This research gives evidence that value chain has a significant impact toward competitiveness of tuna fishery industries.The best strategies to increase competitiveness of tuna fishery industries is increasing a value chain of of tuna fishery industries, Mainly from operational aspect, outbond logistic and services to raise tuna commodity productvity in global market.


Keywords


Industri tuna; Rantai nilai; Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acharyulu, S. G., Subbaiah, K. V., & Rao, K. N. (2015). Value Chain Model for Steel Manufacturing Sector : A Case Study. International Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains, 45-53.

Al-Hawari, M., Hartley, N., & Ward, T. (2005). Measuring Banks’ Automated Service Quality: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Approach. Marketing Buletin, 1-19.

Crisci, A. (2012). Estimation Methods for The Structural Equation Models : Maximum Likehood, Partial Least Square and Generalized Maximum Entrophy. JAQM, 1-15.

Dimitrov, D. M. (2006). Comparing groups on latent variables: A structural equation modeling approach. Work 26, 429-436.

Doll, W. J., Raghunathan, T. S., Lim, J. S., & Gupta, Y. P. (1995). A Confirmatory factor Analysis of the User Information Satisfaction Instrument. Information System Research, 177-179.

Ebders, A., Konig, A., Hungenberg, H., & Engelbertz, T. (2000). Toward an Integrated Perspective of Strategy : The Value Process Framework. Journal of Strategy and Management , 76-96.

FAO. (2015), "Fish Outlook 2015-2024 and 2030," Technical, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation.

Felipe, J. (1997). Total Factor Productivity Growth in East Asia : A Critical Survey. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

Galland, G., Rogers, A., & Nickson, A. (2016). Netting Billions: A Global Valuation of Tuna. The PEW Charitable Trust, 1-28.

Kim, M. (1985). Total Factor Productivity in Bus Transport . Journal of Transport Economic and Policy, 173-182.

Kumar, P. J., Subbaiah, K. V., & Rao, N. (2013). Identification of SWOT Variables for Supplier Selection Through Confirmatory Factor Analysis – A Case Study. International Journal of Mechanical and Production, 19-26.

Lailossa, G. W. (2015). The New Paradigm of Cold Chain Management Systems and It’s Logistics on Tuna Fishery Sector in Indonesia. AACL Bioflux, 381-390.

Maat, S. M., Adnan, M., Abdullah, M. F., Ahmad, C. N., & Puteh, M. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Learning Environment Instrument among High Performance School Student. Creative Education, 640-646.

O‘Mahony, M., & Vecchi, M. (2002). Is There an ICT Impact on TFP? A heterogeneous dynamic panel approach. Discussion Papers-National Institute.

Ondrej, M., & Jiri, H. (2012). Total Factor Productivity Approach in Competitive and Regulated World. International Conference on Asia Pacific Business Innovation and Technology Management, 223-230.

Pavlina, P. (2015). The Factors Influencing Satisfaction with Public City Transport: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Journal of Competitiveness , 18-32.

Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Tengah. (2016). Laporan Tahunan Statistik Perikanan. Dinas Kelautan dan Perikananan Propinsi Jawa Tengah.

Porter, M. (2004). Building the Microeconomic Foundation of Prosperity (A Lopez-Claroz (Ed) ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press.

Porter, M. E. (1990). Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.

Porter, M. E. (1998). Cluster and the New Economic of Competition. Harvard Bussiness Review, 1-77.

PPS-Cilacap. (2016). Laporan Tahunan Statistik.

Safiih, M. L., & Azreen, N. M. (2016). Confirmatory Factor Analysis Approach: A Case Study of Mathematics Students’ Achievement in TIMSS. Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences , 41-51.

Suhana. (2015). Development of Indonesia Marine in 2014. ResearchGate.

Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham: MA: Allyn & Bacon.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15578/jkpi.10.1.2018.11-23


Creative Commons License
Jurnal Kebijakan Perikanan Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
p-ISSN 1979-6366
e-ISSN 2502-6550

Crossref logoSHERPA/RoMEO Logogoogle scholardoaj