UPAYA MEMBANGUN KEMBALI DAN PEMULIHAN STOK IKAN PELAGIS KECIL DI LAUT JAWA
Abstract
Tujuan utama makalah ini adalah mengevaluasi kondisi stok ikan pelagis kecil (dengan ikan layang Decapterus spp. sebagai acuan) sebagai pembangkit ekonomi di pantai Utara Jawa perairan laut Jawa WPPNRI 712. Analisis dilakukan sejalan dengan tren penurunan aktivitas penangkapan kapal pukat cincin yang berpangkalan di Pekalongan Jawa Tengah yang telah berlangsung selama hampir dua dekade. Teori klasik tentang penangkapan ikan mengisyaratkan bahwa pemulihan populasi ikan dapat berlangsung cepat jika penangkapan ikan dihentikan pada rentang waktu tertentu. Analisis menggunakan pendekatan surplus produksi non-ekuilibrium dengan bantuan perangkat aplikasi ASPIC 7 dan Kobe plot digunakan untuk memetakan perubahan arah status stok ikan pelagis kecil yang berkaitan langsung dengan perilaku perkembangan perikanan pukat cincin di laut Jawa pada kurun waktu 1976 - 2014. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penurunan drastis baik jumlah armada pukat cincin maupun aktivitas penangkapannya akibat rendahnya peluang keberhasilan dan tingginya investasi operasional hampir dua dekade telah telah memberikan peluang terhadap pemulihan stok secara alamiah menuju tingkat biomassa optimal. Pergerakan status biomasa dan mortalitas penangkapan ikan pelagis kecil secara tahunan yang ditampilkan melalui penggunaan Kobe plot memberikan indikasi bahwa kondisi stok ikan setelah tahun 2015 mengarah pada status yang cenderung baik.
The main objective of this paper is to evaluate the status and trend of small pelagic fish stocks (Decapterus spp.) as a major driver of economics in north coast of Java correspond to a direct reduction of purse seine fishing activities at around two decades. Classical theory of fishing suggests that rapid population recovery occurs when fishing pressures is reduced. These phenomenons were analyzed by applying non-equilibrium surplus production model incorporate covariance of the programs package of Aspic 7. Simple Kobe plots were also applied to track the annual trend of stock status directly which presumably related to the course of fisheries development. The results showed that drastic decline of fishing pressures of both number of purse seine fleet and their activity within the last decade provided an opportunity of stock recovery at optimum biomass levels. Applying simple Kobe plots indicates the stock status and trend in 2015 relatively in rebuilding condition
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Atmaja, S.B. (2008). Sumberdaya Ikan Pelagis Kecil: Dinamika Perikanan Pukat Cincin di laut Jawa dan Sekitarnya. Balai Riset Perikanan Laut. 98 hal
--------------- (2009). Dinamika Perikanan Pukat Cincin sebagai Indikator Perilaku antar Wilayah Pengelolaan Perikanan. Seminar Hasil Pelaksanaan Penelitian bagi Peneliti dan Perekayasa Sesuai Prioritas Nasional Tahun 2009. Jakarta. 15 – 16 Desember 2009
Atmaja, S.B. & Nugroho, D. 2011. Impact of the Increasing Catchability Coefficient of the Large Purse Seiner to the Depletion of the Small Pelagic Fish Biomass in The Java Sea. Ind. Fish. Res. J. 17(1): 13-20.
Atmaja, S. B, Nugroho, D. & Natsir, M. 2011. Respons radikal kelebihan kapasitas penangkapan armada pukat cincin semi industri di Laut Jawa. J. Lit. Perikan. Ind. 17(2), 115-123.
Atmaja S.B., Natsir, M. & Sadhotomo, B. (2012). Dinamika Spasial Perikanan Pukat cincin di Laut Jawa dan Samudera Hindia. J. Lit. Perikan. Ind. 18 (2): 69-76.
Atmaja S.B.,. Sadhotomo, B. & Nugroho., D. (2017). Aplikasi Model Surplus Produksi non-ekuilibrium pada Perikanan Layang (Decapterus macrosoma) di Laut Jawa. J. Lit. Perikan.Ind. 23 (1): 57 - 66
Atmaja, S. B., Nugroho, D & Suryanto. (2014). Adaptasi perikanan pukat cincin di laut jawa dan implikasinya terhadap pengelolaan. J. Kebijak. Perikan. Ind. 6(2), 105-111.
Becker, A., Taylor, M.D., Lowry, M.B., Grabowski, J. (2017). Monitoring of reef associated and pelagic fish communities on Australia’s first purpose built offshore artificial reef. ICES Jour. of Mar. Sci. 74(1): 277–285.
Benson, A.J., Cooper, A.B., & Carruthers, T.R.. (2016). An Evaluation of Rebuilding Policies for U.S. Fisheries. journals.plos.org/plosone/ article? http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0146278
Christopher C., Ovandoa, D. Clavellea, T. Strauss, C. K. Hilborn, R. Melnychuk, M. C. Branch, T. A. Gainesa, S. D. Szuwalskia, C.S. Cabral, R. B. Raderb, D. N. & Leland, A. (2016). Global fishery prospects under contrasting management regimes. PNAS. 113(18), 5125-5129. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1520420113.
Direktorat Jenderal Perikanan (1976-2000) Statistik perikanan Indonesia menurut propinsi Departemen Pertanian, Direktorat Jenderal Perikanan, Jakarta.
Direktorat Jenderal Perikanan Tangkap (2001-2015). Statistik Perikanan Tangkap Indonesia menurut propinsi. Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan.
Enberg, K., Jørgensen, C. Dunlop, E.S. Heino, M. & Dieckmann, U. (2009). Implications of fisheries-induced evolution for stock rebuilding and recovery. Evolutionary Applications ISSN 1752-4571 doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00077.x
FAO (2016). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Contributing to Food Security and Nutrition for All. FAO, Rome. 204 p.
Freitas, B., Delagran, L. Griffin, E. Miller, K.L. Hirshfield, M. (2008). Too Few Fish: A Regional Assessment of the World’s Fisheries. Oceana. 30 p.
Haddon, M. (2011). Modelling and quantitative methods in fisheries. 2nd Edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC. New York. 465 p.
Hilborn, R.., Hively, D.J. Jensen O P. &. Branch, T.A. (2014). The dynamics of fish populations at low abundance and prospects for rebuilding and recovery. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 71: 2141–2151.
Hutchinson, W. F., (2008). The dangers of ignoring stock complexity in fishery management: the case of the North Sea cod. Biol Lett. 4(6): 693–695.
Krebs, C.J. (1985). Ecology, the experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. Harper & Row, Publishers, New York. 800p
Murawski, S. A. (2010). Rebuilding depleted fish stocks: the good, the bad, and, mostly, the ugly. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 67: 1830–1840.
Neubauer, P., Jensen, O. P..Hutchings, J. A, & Baum, J. K.. (2013). Resilience and recovery of overexploited marine populations. Science, 340: 347–349.
Pauly, D., Alder, J., Bennett, E., Christensen, V., Tyedmers P., Watson, R. (2003). The future for fisheries. Science. 302(5649):1359-61.
Patrick, W.S & Cope, J.. (2014). Examining the 10-Year Rebuilding Dilemma for U.S. Fish Stocks. journals.plos.org/plosone 9 (11): e112232. htps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112232
Prager, M.H. (1994). A suite of extension to a non-equilibrium surplus-production model. Fishery Bulletin US ;92:374-389
Restrepo, V. (2011). Stock Assessment 101: Current Practice for Tuna Stocks. http://www.trimarinegroup.com/resources/papers/Stock20Assessments2010.pdf
Safina, C., Rosenberg, A. A. Myers, R. A. Quinn, T. J. II & Collie, J. S. (2005). U.S. ocean 531 fish recovery: staying the course. Science, 309: 707-708.
Syed, S., Borit, M. Spruit, M. 2018. Narrow lenses for capturing the complexity of fisheries: A topic analysis of fisheries science from 1990 to 2016. Fish and Fisheries 19(4): 643-661.
Thorson, J.T., Cope, J.M., Branch, T.A., & Jensen, O.P. (2012). Spawning biomass reference points for exploited marine fishes, incorporating taxonomic and body size information. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 69: 1556–1568.
Worm, B., Hilborn, R., Baum, J.K., Branch, T.A., Collie, J.S., Costello, C., & Fogarty, M.J. (2009). Rebuilding Global Fisheries. Science, 325: 578–585.
Zhou, S., Smith, A. D. M. & Knudsen, E. E. 2015. Ending overfishing while catching more fish. Fish and Fisheries. 16, 716-722. DOI: 10.1111/faf.12077
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15578/jppi.25.3.2019.179-189
Jurnal Penelitian Perikanan Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
