Integrasi Kelembagaan Pengelolaan Kawasan Konservasi Perairan Daerah Kabupaten Raja Ampat Melalui Analisis Level Aksi Kelembagaan
Abstract
Masalah pengelolaan kawasan konservasi seringkali dipengaruhi oleh ketidaksesuaian kebijakan antara pemerintah pusat, pemerintah provinsi dan pemerintah kabupaten serta bagaimana kepatuhan terhadap pelaksanaan kebijakan tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji integrasi kelembagaan pengelolaan kawasan konservasi perairan daerah melalui analisis pada tiga level aksi kelembagaan yaitu level konstitusional, kolektif dan operasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan analisis konten peraturan dan analisis deskriptif. Penelitian dilakukan di Kampung Arborek, Yenbuba dan Sawinggrai Kabupaten Raja Ampat pada bulan Oktober 2022. Pengumpulan data diperoleh melalui wawancara, observasi, focus group discussion dan analisis dokumen Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Integrasi kelembagaan dalam pengelolaan kawasan konservasi perairan daerah Kabupaten Raja Ampat telah terbentuk. Pada level konstitusional, integrasi kelembagaan terlihat dari kesesuaian aturan mengenai pihak yang berwenang dalam penyusunan rencana zonasi dan pengelolaan kawasan konservasi perairan serta adanya pengakuan kewenangan masyarakat adat. Pada integrasi di level kolektif terwujud melalui adanya kesesuaian tujuan lintas sektor dan kerjasama antar pemangku kepentingan. Pada level operasional, integrasi kelembagaan terwujud melalui kesesuaian pemahaman mengenai batas wilayah konservasi perairan, pelaksanaan aturan konservasi dan pemberlakuan sanksi. Rekomendasi kebijakan yang dapat memperkuat integrasi kelembagaan pengelolaan kawasan konservasi perairan Raja Ampat antara lain: 1) penyesuaian pembaruan penetapan kebijakan mengenai wewenang pengelolaan antara pemerintah pusat, provinsi dan kabupaten; 2) peningkatan kapasitas kelembagaan Dewan Adat Suku Maya dengan cara memberi dukungan dana, keterampilan, atau keahlian untuk menjalankan program-program konservasi perairan; 3) penyesuaian luas konservasi antara yang ditetapkan oleh pemerintah pusat, pemerintah provinsi Papua Barat dan pemerintah Kabupaten Raja Ampat; serta 4) pemberian tanda batas pada zona-zona konservasi.
Title : The Institutional Integration of Marine Conservation Area Management in Raja Ampat Regency Through Institutional Action Level Analysis
The management of conservation areas is often influenced by the misalignment of policies between the central government, provincial government, and regional government, as well as the level of compliance with the implementation of these policies. This study aims to examine the institutional integration in the management of regional marine conservasion areas through an analysis of three institutional levels: constitutional, collective and operational. A qualitative method with a policy analysis and descriptive analysis approach was employed. The research was conducted in the villages of Arborek, Yenbuba, and Sawinggrai, Raja Ampat Regency, in October 2022. Data were collected through interviews, observations, focus group discussions, and document analysis. The findings show that institutional integration in the management of marine conservation areas in Raja Ampat Regency has been established. At the constitutional level, institutional integration is reflected in the alignment of regulations concerning the authorities responsible for drafting zoning plans and managing marine conservation areas, as well as the recognition of indigenous people’s authority. At the collective level, institutional integration is manifested in the alignment of cross-sectoral objectives, collaboration among stakeholders, and the involvement of indigenous communities. At the operational level, institutional integration is evident in the consistency of understanding regarding the boundaries of marine conservation area, the enforcement of conservation regulations, and the imposition of sanctions. Policy recommendations that could strengthen institutional integration in the management of marine conservation area in Raja Ampat include: 1) adjusting policies regarding management authority between the central, provincial, and regionak governments; 2) enhancing the institutional capacity of the Maya Indigenous Council by providing financial support, skills, or expertise to support marine conservation programs; 3) adjusting the area of the conservation between the central government,the West Papua Provincial Government and the Raja Ampat Regency government; and 4) marking boundaries in the marine conservation zones.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agrawal, A., & Chhatre, A. (2006). Explaining success on the commons: Community forest governance in the Indian Himalaya. World Development, 34(1), 149-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.013
Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C.C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2
Agrawal A, Ostrom E. 2001. Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics and Society. 29(4):485-514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329201029004002
Allen, G.R., & Erdmann, M.V. (2009). Reef fishes of the Bird’s Head Peninsula, West Papua, Indonesia. Check List. 5:587–628. https://doi.org/10.15560/5.3.587
Baird, J., Plummer, R., Schultz, L., Armitage, D., & Bodin, O. (2019). How does socio- institutional diversity affect collaborative governance of social– ecological systems in practice?. Environmental Management, 63(2), 200-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1123-5
Balata, F., & Williams, C. (2020). The role of coastal communities in the sustainable management of marine protected areas. Science, Policy and Management, 113-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102698-4.00006-X
Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred ecology: traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Taylor & Francis.
Brinkerhoff, D.W., & Goldsmith, A.A. (1992). Promoting the sustainability of development institutions: a framework for strategy. World development, 20(3), 369-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(92)90030-Y
Brown, H.C.P. (2018). An Assessment of institutional capacity for integrated landscape management in Eastern Cameroon. Environmental Management, 62(1): 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1048-z
Burke, L., Reytar, K., Spalding, M., & Perry, A. (2011). Reefs at Risk Revisited. World Resources Institute. https://www.wri.org/publication/reefs-at-risk-revisited
Buscher, B., & Fletcher, R. (2020). The conservation revolution: radical ideas for saving nature beyond the anthropocene. London: Verso Books.
Candel, J. J., & Biesbroek, R. (2016). Toward a processual understanding of policy integration. Policy Science, 49(3), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9248-y
Cinner, J., Huchery, C., Macneil, A., & Graham, N.A.J. (2016). Bright spots among the world's coral reefs. Nature, 546(7612), 416-419. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18607
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543
Domorenok, E., Graziano, P., & Polverari, L. (2021). Introduction: policy integration and institutional capacity: theoretical, conceptual and empirical challenges. Policy and Society, 40 (1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1902058
FAO. (2018). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2018. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/3/i9540en/I9540EN.pdf
Fidelman, P., Evans, L., Fabinyi, M., Foale, S., Cinner, J., & Rosen, F. (2012). Governing large-scale marine commons: contextual challenge in the coral triangle. Marine Policy, 36(1), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2011.03.007
Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance?. Governance, 26(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12035
Govan, H., Tawake, A., & Tabunakawai, K. (2006). Community-based marine resource management in the South Pacific. Community Conserved Area, 16(1), 63-67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233858776_Community-based_marine_resource_management_in_the_South_Pacific
Grigg, N.S. (2005). Institutional analysis of infrastructure problems: case study of water quality in distribution systems. Journal of Management in Engineering, 21(4), 152-158. https://doi.org10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2005)21:4(152)
Howlett, M., & Saguin, K. (2018). Policy capacity for policy integration: Implications for the sustainable development goals. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy Working Paper Series. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3157448
Hukom, F.D., Yulianda, F., Bengen, D.G., & Kamal, M.M. (2019). Efektivitas Zonasi dalam Pengelolaan Perikanan Karang di Kawasan Konservasi Perairan Selat Dampier, Raja Ampat. Jurnal Kebijakan Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan, 9 (2), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.15578/jksekp. v9i2.7661
Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory and Practice, 5(4), 419-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000293170
Jordan, A., & Schout, A. (2006). The coordination of the European union: Exploring the capacities of networked governance. Oxford University Press.
Keputusan Gubernur Papua Barat nomor 523/124/7 tahun 2019 tentang rencana pengelolaan dan zonasi kawasan konservasi perairan Kepulauan Raja Ampat di Provinsi Papua Barat tahun 2019 – 2038. https://birdsheadseascape.com/download/legislation%20and%20legal%20documents/SK-Gubernur-RPZ-Raja-Ampat_2019.pdf
Kukk, P., Moors, E.H.M., & Hekkert, M.P. (2016). Institutional Power Play in Innovation Systems: The Case of Herceptin Research Policy, 45(8), 1558-1569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.016
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Mascia, M. B., & Pailler, S. (2010). Protected Area Downgrading, Downsizing, and Degazettement (PADDD) and its conservation implications. Conservation Letters, 4(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00147.x
Mcclanahan, T.R., Sheppard, C., & Obura, D. (2000). Coral reefs of the indian ocean: their ecology and conservation. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 273(2), 525. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(02)00147-8
Nuraini, Satria, A., Wahyuni, E.S., & Bengen, D.G. (2024). Mekanisme dan Kunci Keberhasilan Pengelolaan Kolaborasi Ekowisata Bahari di Kawasan Konservasi Raja Ampat. Buletin Ilmiah Marina Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan, 10 (1), 25-40. https://doi.org/10.15578/marina.v10i1.13054
Nuraini, Satria, A., Wahyuni, E.S., & Bengen, D.G. (2021). Program Strategis dalam Mengatasi Kendala Kelembagaan Pengelolaan Ekowisata Bahari di Raja Ampat (Studi Kasus: Kampung Wisata Distrik Meos Mansar). Jurnal Kebijakan Sosek KP, 11(2), 127 -143. https://doi.org/10.15578/jksekp.v11i2.9655
Nuraini, Satria, A., Wahyuni, E.S., & Bengen, D.G. (2021). Strengthening Marine Ecotourism Management’s Institutional Performance in Raja Ampat, Indonesia. Pertanika Journal Social Sciences and Humanities, 29 (3), 1809-1829. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.3.18 Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. Cambridge Univ Press.
Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419-422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
Peraturan Bupati Raja Ampat nomor 5 tahun 2009 tentang Kawasan Konservasi Laut Daerah (KKLD) Kabupaten Raja Ampat Provinsi Papua Barat. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/82957/perbup-kab-raja-ampat-no-5-tahun-2009
Peraturan Bupati Raja Ampat nomor 8 tahun 2017 tentang perlindungan ikan dan biota laut dan potensi sumber daya alam llainnya di wilayah pesisir laut dalam pertuanan Adat Suku Maya Raja Ampat. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/82956/perbup-kab-raja-ampat-no-8-tahun-2017
Peraturan daerah Kabupaten Raja Ampat nomor 27 tahun 2008 tentang penetapan Kawasan Konservasi Laut Daerah (KKLD) Kabupaten Raja Ampat. https://theseapeople.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/1-Perda_27_2008_kkld_kabR4.pdf
Peraturan daerah khusus Provinsi Papua Barat nomor 9 tahun 2019 tentang pedoman pengakuan, pelindungan, pemberdayaan masyarakat hukum adat dan wilayah adat di Provinsi Papua Barat. https://balitbangda.papuabaratprov.go.id/po-content/uploads/perdasus_no._9_tahun_2019_tentang_mha__final_manokwari_-_19_januari_2021_1.pdf
Peraturan Gubernur Provinsi Papua Barat nomor 10 tahun 2021 tentang pengelolaan sumber daya ikan terbang di wilayah perairan Provinsi Papua Barat. https://infoperaturan.id/provinsi/peraturan-gubernur-papua-barat-nomor-10-tahun-2021/
Peraturan Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan Republik Indonesia nomor 31 tahun 2020 tentang pengelolaan kawasan konservasi. https://jdih.maritim.go.id/cfind/source/files/permen-kp/permen-kp-nomor-31-tahun-2020.pdf
Peters, B. G. (2015). Policy capacity in public administration. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.005
Peters, B. G. (2018). The challenge of policy coordination. Policy Design and Practice, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1437946
Rahmafitria, F., & Purboyo, H. (2021). The integration of local creativity-based tourism by the LED approach. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 683(1):012117. https:/doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/683/1/012117
Ramesh, M., Howlett, M., & Saguin, K. (2016). Measuring individual-level analytical managerial and political policy capacity: A survey instrument. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy. Working Paper Series. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2777382
Rayner, J., & Howlett, M. (2009). Introduction: Understanding integrated policy strategies and their evolution. Policy and Society, 28(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.05.001
Rudyanto, Rumetna, L., Setyawan, D., & Prabowo, N.A. (2015). Laporan akhir dokumentasi proses dan pembentukkan KKPD Raja Ampat dan Pembentukan BLUD UPTD KKPD Raja Ampat. The Nature Conservancy Indonesia. https://www.ykan.or.id/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/ykan/buku-dan-jurnal/iop/Sejarah-Pembentukan-Kawasan-Konservasi-Perairan-Raja-Ampat.pdf
Satria, A. (2009). Pesisir dan Laut untuk Rakyat. IPB Press.
Shahabuddin, G., & Rao, M. (2010). Do community-conserved areas effectively conserve biological diversity, global insights, and the Indian context. Biological Conservation, 143, 2926-2936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.040
Tuncer, G., Tekkaya, C., Sungur, S., & Cakiroglu, J. (2009). Assessing pre-service teachers’ environmental literacy in Turkey as a mean to develop teacher education programs. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(4), 426-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.10.003
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia nomor 5 tahun 1990 tentang konservasi sumber daya alam hayati dan ekosistem. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/46710/uu-no-5-tahun-1990
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia nomor 21 Tahun 2001 tentang otonomi khusus Papua. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/44901/uu-no-21-tahun-2001
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia nomor 23 tahun 2014 tentang pemerintah daerah. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38685/uu-no-23-tahun-2014
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia nomor 1 Tahun 2014 tentang pengelolaan wilayah pesisir dan pulau-pulau kecil. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38521/uu-no-1-tahun-2014
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang penetapan peraturan pemerintah pengganti undang-undang nomor 2 tahun 2022 tentang cipta kerja menjadi undang-undang. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/246523/uu-no-6-tahun-2023
Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy & Society, 34(3–4), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.001
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15578/jksekp.v15i1.14900
Indexed by:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Published by
Research Center for Marine and Fisheries Socio-Economic
in collaboration with
Indonesian Marine and Fisheries Socio-Economics Research Network
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.