RELASI PATRON–KLIEN DAN KINERJA EKONOMI USAHA PETAMBAK GARAM RAKYAT: STUDI KOMPARATIF DI KABUPATEN PAMEKASAN DAN SAMPANG, MADURA
Abstract
Literatur patron–klien dalam ekonomi pedesaan cenderung memosisikan patronase sebagai mekanisme proteksi ekonomi atau substitusi rasional atas kegagalan pasar. Studi ini menguji asumsi tersebut melalui analisis komparatif kinerja ekonomi petambak garam rakyat berdasarkan status keterikatan patronase dalam konteks pasar yang tidak sempurna. Survei kuantitatif dilakukan terhadap 200 rumah tangga petambak di Kabupaten Pamekasan dan Kabupaten Sampang, dengan pengujian perbedaan menggunakan Mann–Whitney U Test akibat distribusi data yang tidak sepenuhnya normal. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa dampak relasi patron–klien tidak bersifat universal. Di Kabupaten Pamekasan, keterikatan patronase berkorelasi signifikan dengan perbedaan produksi, pendapatan, keuntungan, dan rasio efisiensi usaha. Sebaliknya, di Kabupaten Sampang tidak ditemukan perbedaan signifikan pada indikator yang sama. Kontras ini menunjukkan bahwa patronase bukan determinan tunggal performa ekonomi, melainkan institusi yang efektivitasnya bersifat kontingen terhadap kapasitas ekonomi patron, struktur biaya, skala produksi, dan homogenitas teknologi lokal. Studi ini mematahkan asumsi bahwa patronase secara inheren protektif atau eksploitatif, dengan menunjukkan bahwa dampaknya terhadap kinerja usaha sangat kontekstual bahkan dalam komoditas dan wilayah geografis yang serupa. Kontribusi utama penelitian ini terletak pada pembuktian empiris komparatif bahwa relasi patron–klien dalam usaha garam rakyat beroperasi sebagai konfigurasi kelembagaan yang efek ekonominya tidak seragam, sehingga memerlukan pendekatan kebijakan yang diferensial dan berbasis konteks.
TITLE: PATRON–CLIENT RELATIONS AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF SMALLHOLDER SALT FARMING: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN PAMEKASAN AND SAMPANG REGENCIES, MADURA
The dominant literature on patron–client relations in rural economies tends to frame patronage either as an economic protection mechanism or as a rational substitute for formal market failures. This study critically examines that assumption through a comparative analysis of the economic performance of small-scale salt farmers based on patronage attachment within imperfect market conditions. A quantitative survey of 200 farming households in Pamekasan Regency and Sampang Regency was conducted, and group differences were tested using the Mann–Whitney U Test due to non-normal data distribution. The findings demonstrate that the economic effects of patron–client relations are not universal. In Pamekasan Regency, patronage attachment is significantly associated with differences in production, income, profit, and business efficiency. In contrast, no statistically significant differences are observed in Sampang Regency. This contrast indicates that patronage is not a single determinant of economic performance, but rather an institutional configuration whose effectiveness is contingent upon the patron’s economic capacity, cost structure, production scale, and local technological homogeneity. This study challenges the conventional dichotomy that portrays patronage as inherently protective or exploitative. Instead, it provides comparative empirical evidence that patron–client relations in small-scale salt production operate as context-dependent institutional arrangements with non-uniform economic effects. The results underscore the need for differentiated, context-sensitive policy interventions rather than universal prescriptions regarding informal economic institutions.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amal, Maddatuang, Fitri Handayani, Irwansyah Sukri, & Muhammad Faisal Juanda. (2023). Strategi Bertahan Hidup Nelayan Tradisional dalam Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Keluarga di Kelurahan Biringkassi Kecamatan Binamu Kabupaten Jeneponto. Indonesian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Geography, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.61220/ijfag.v1i1.202305
Andersson, C. I. M., Chege, C. G. K., Rao, E. J. O., & Qaim, M. (2015). Following Up on Smallholder Farmers and Supermarkets in Kenya. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97(4), 1247–1266. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aav006
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2015). Mastering ’Metrics: The Path from Cause to Effect. Princeton University Press.
Barrett, C. B., Reardon, T., & Webb, P. (2001). Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa: Concepts, dynamics, and policy implications. Food Policy, 26(4), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(01)00014-8
Bellemare, M. F., & Bloem, J. R. (2018). Does contract farming improve welfare? A review. World Development, 112, 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.018
Béné, C., Macfadyen, G., & Allison, E. H. (with FAO). (2007). Increasing the contribution of small-scale fisheries to poverty alleviation and food security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Cleaver, F., & de Koning, J. de. (2015). Furthering critical institutionalism. International Journal of the Commons, 9(1), 1–18.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed). Sage Publications.
Efani, A., Manzilati, A., & Rahman, Moh. S. (2021). Adopsi Nelayan terhadap Kredit Keuangan Skala Kecil. Buletin Ilmiah Marina Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan, 7(2), 97. https://doi.org/10.15578/marina.v7i2.8703
Fafchamps, M. (2003). Market Institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Theory and Evidence. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4445.001.0001
Fafchamps, M., & Hill, R. V. (2004). Selling at the Farm-Gate or Travelling to Market (Centre for the Study of African Economies 87). University of Oxford,.
FAO. (2018). Meeting the sustainable development goals. FAO.
FAO. (2020). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020 (Vol. 8). FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9229en
Gollin, D., Hansen, C. W., & Wingender, A. M. (2021). Two Blades of Grass: The Impact of the Green Revolution. Journal of Political Economy, 129(8), 2344–2384. https://doi.org/10.1086/714444
Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed). McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Hall, D., Hirsch, P., & Li, M. T. (2011). Powers of exclusion: Land dilemmas in Southeast Asia. National University of Singapore.
Hanik, U., & Mutmainah, M. (2020). Analisis Kinerja Dan Kebutuhan Petani Garam Di Kabupaten Pamekasan Sebagai Dasar Pengembangan Desain Model Social Learning. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan, 15(2), 237. https://doi.org/10.15578/jsekp.v15i2.7842
Heriyadi, M. A., Indrabudi, T., Sapanli, K., & Tampubolon, B. I. (2022). Analisis Perkembangan Nilai Tukar Petambak Garam. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan, 8(1), 1.
Imbens, G. W. (2021). Statistical Significance, p -Values, and the Reporting of Uncertainty. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(3), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.3.157
Kadariah. (2001). Evaluasi proyek analisis ekonomis. Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan. (2024a). Petambak Garam | KKP RI. https://portaldata.kkp.go.id/portals/data-statistik/petambak_garam/summary
Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan. (2024b). Produksi Garam | KKP RI. https://portaldata.kkp.go.id/portals/data-statistik/prod_garam/summary
Lohr, S. L. (2019). Sampling: Design and Analysis (2nd ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429296284
Milenović, Ž. (2011). Application Of Mann-Whitney U Test In Research Of Professional Training Of Primary School Teachers. Metodički Obzori/Methodological Horizons, 6(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.32728/mo.06.1.2011.06
Mira, M., Sujarwo, P. A., Triyanti, R., Shafitri, N., & Zulham, A. (2022). Analisis Komparatif Usaha Tambak Udang Vaname Dengan Teknik Tradisional, Semiintensif, Dan Intensif Di Wilayah Pesisir. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan, 17(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.15578/jsekp.v17i1.10228
Mosse, D. (2013). The Anthropology of International Development. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42(1), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155553
Muhartono, R., Sumarti, T., Saharuddin, S., & Koeshendrajana, S. (2023). Nelayan Kecil di Perkotaan: Karakteristik Usaha dan Jaringan Sosial dalam Mengakses Pembiayaan di Marunda, Jakarta Utara. Buletin Ilmiah Marina Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan, 8(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15578/marina.v9i1.11919
Nissa, Z. N. A., & Suadi, S. (2022). Indeks Kerentanan Penghidupan Pembudidaya Ikan Nila Keramba Jaring Apung Di Waduk Gajah Mungkur, Kabupaten Wonogiri. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan, 17(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.15578/jsekp.v17i1.10024
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
Nusantara, T. S., Rafli, M., & Nurkholipah, S. (2025). Strategi peningkatan kesejahteraan nelayan dan pembudidaya ikan dalam perspektif sosial ekonomi. 1(1).
OECD. (2012). Rebuilding Fisheries: The Way Forward. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264176935-en
Oluigbo, C. U., Ohaegbu, P. M. N. I., & Ngozi, E. C. (2024). Determination Of Sample Sizes In Research Using Taro Yamane Formula: An Overview. Proceedings of the 1stAnnual Faculty of Science International Conference, Niger Delta University 2024 (AFSIC-NDU2024). Harnessing current and emerging scientific innovations for nation building, and development in the 21st century.
Popkin, S. L. (1979). The rational peasant: The political economy of rural society in Vietnam. University of California Press.
Prihantini, C. I., Syaukat, Y., & Fariyanti, A. (2016). Analisis Pinjaman Dan Biaya Pinjaman Dalam Pola Bagi Hasil Usaha Garam Rakyat Di Kabupaten Pamekasan, Jawa Timur. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan, 11(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.15578/jsekp.v11i1.3176
Prihantini, C. I., Syaukat, Y., & Fariyanti, A. (2017). Perbandingan Keuntungan Dengan Sistem Bagi Hasil Pada Usaha Garam Rakyat Di Kabupaten Pamekasan, Jawa Timur. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan, 12(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.15578/jsekp.v12i1.3628
Renkow, M., & Byerlee, D. (2010). The impacts of CGIAR research: A review of recent evidence. Food Policy, 35(5), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.04.006
Scott, J. C. (1972). Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia. American Political Science Review, 66(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959280
Tambunan, I. K., Nugroho, F., & Metalisa, R. (2023). Modal Sosial Nelayan Suku Duano Dalam Skala Usaha Perikanan Tangkap. Buletin Ilmiah Marina Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan, 9(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15578/marina.v9i1.11821
Thirtle, C., Lin, L., & Piesse, J. (2003). The Impact of Research-Led Agricultural Productivity Growth on Poverty Reduction in Africa, Asia and Latin America. World Development, 31(12), 1959–1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.07.001
Toiba, H., Nugroho, T. W., Retnoningsih, D., & Rahman, Moh. S. (2020). Food system transformation and its impact on smallholder farmers’ income and food security in Indonesia. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1854412. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1854412
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets and Relational Contracting. Free Press.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2016). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (Sixth edition, student edition). Cengage Learning.
Youwikijaya, S. E., Kinseng, R. A., Sumarti, T., & Hilmawan, A. (2023). Identifikasi Penguasaan Dan Akses Modal Rumah Tangga Nelayan Kecil Di Pulau-Pulau Kecil (Kasus Pulau Pari). Buletin Ilmiah Marina Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan, 9(2). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15578/marina.v9i2.12003
Yusuf, I. H., Umar, G. S., & Jamiu, W. (2021). Impact of a Contract Farming Scheme on Income, Food Security, and Nutrition among Maize Farmers in North Western, Nigeria. Journal of Nutrition and Food Security. https://doi.org/10.18502/jnfs.v6i2.6060
Zainuri, M., Effendy, M., Muhsoni, F. F., Budianto, A., & Syaiful, M. (2020). Pemetaan Lahan Garam Di Jawa Timur.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15578/marina.v12i1.16894
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexed by:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Published by
Balai Besar Riset Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan
in collaboration with
Indonesian Marine and Fisheries Socio-Economics Research Network

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

























