KONSEP HAK PENGELOLAAN PERIKANAN SEBAGAI ALAT PENGELOLAAN PERIKANAN BERKELANJUTAN DI INDONESIA

Abdul Halim, Budy Wiryawan, Neil R Loneragan, M. Fedi A Sondita, Adrian Hordyk, Dedi S Adhuri, Tukul R Adi, Luky Adrianto

Abstract


Pengelolaan perikanan di Indonesia saat ini belum sepenuhnya mampu mengatasi motivasi perlombaan menangkap ikan. Kondisi yang dikenal sebagai open access ini, perlu segera diatasi untuk mencegah berlanjutnya tangkap lebih. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan konsep Hak Pengelolaan Perikanan (HPP), yang berpotensi diterapkan sebagai alat pengelolaan perikanan termasuk yang berada dekat pantai di Indonesia untuk mengatasi masalah perikanan open access. Metoda qualitative content analysis yang ditriangulasi melalui diskusi kelompok terfokus melibatkan para ahli, pengambil keputusan dan praktisi, digunakan untuk menjelaskan konsep HPP di Indonesia. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan pengelolaan HPP melegitimasi entitas pemegang HPP mengamankan kesempatannya menangkap ikan secara ekslusif dengan mencegah pihak lain mengeksploitasi sumber daya ikan secara berlebihan. Pembelajaran dari negara lain menunjukkan bahwa HPP yang diintegrasikan kedalam kerangka rencana pengelolaan perikanan, bisa mengatasi permasalahan perikanan open access, karena mampu meredam motivasi dan tindakan nelayan dalam melakukan perlombaan menangkap ikan. Penggunaan ilmu pengetahuan kontemporer dan kearifan lokal dalam menentukan batasan tangkapan lestari dibarengi dengan upaya pemantauan dan penegakan aturan menentukan keberhasilan penerapannya. Terlihat juga bahwa praktek tradisional seperti Sasi di Maluku yang dimungkinkan oleh adanya pengakuan hak ulayat ‘petuanan laut’ merupakan konsep pemanfaatan sumber daya alam secara eksklusif yang selaras dengan esensi dari HPP. Direkomendasikan agar model pengelolaan berbasis HPP ini dilegitimasi kedalam peraturan perundang-undangan, termasuk Undang-Undang Perikanan Republik Indonesia.

 

The existing management measures of Indonesian fisheries has not yet successfully resolved the overfishing. Fishers are still motivated to race for fish resources as typically occurs in an open access fisheries. This circumstance must be addressed immediately to prevent fisheries collapse. This research aims to describe a concept of Fisheries Management Rights (FMRs) as a management tool. This concept is potentially applicable in Indonesia, especially for near-shore fisheries. A qualitative content analysis method, triangulated through focus group discussions that involved experts, decision makers and practitioners was used to describe FMRs concept. The results indicated that this approach legitimizes the entities of the right holders to secure their exploitation right and to prevent others from over exploiting their fisheries resources. Lessons learnt from other countries showed that this approach that have been  integrated within fisheries management plan, successfully addressed open access problem as it prevents fishers’ motivation to the race for fish. This approach need the contemporary and traditional sciences to inform allowable catch to ensure the success implementation. For instance, “Sasi”, traditional fishing right in Maluku  is have similar framework with the contemporary FMRs. Therefore, FMRs should be acknowledged and adopted into Indonesian’ regulations to prevent the over-exploitation


Keywords


Hak pengelolaan perikanan; perikanan berkelanjutan; perikanan open access; petuanan laut; Sasi.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbott, J.K., Garber-Yonts, B., & Wilen, J.E. (2010). Employment and Remuneration Effects of IFQs in the Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands Crab Fisheries. Marine Resource Economics, 25,333-354.

Adhuri, D.S. (2013). Selling the Sea, Fishing for Power, a study of conflict over marine tenure in Kei Islands, Eastern Indonesia. Asia-Pacific Environment Monograph 8. The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

Afflerbach, J.C., Lester, S.E., Dougherty, D.T., & Poon, S.E. (2014). A global survey of ‘‘TURF-reserves’’, Territorial Use Rights for Fisheries coupled with marine reserves. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2: 97–106.

Afriansyah, A. (2016). Kajian Hukum Atas Pengelolaan Perikanan di Indonesia Khususnya Kemungkinan Penerapan Pengelolaan Perikanan Berbasis Hak (Right-Based Fishery Management). 49p.

Beddington, J.R., Agnew, D.J., & Clark, C.W. (2007). Current problems in the management of marine fisheries. Science, 316: 1713–1716.

Bonzon, K., McIlwain, K., Strauss, C.K., & Van Leuvan, T. (2013). Catch Share Design Manual, Volume 1: A Guide for Managers and Fishermen (2nd ed.). Environmental Defense Fund. 173p.

Costello, C., Ovando, D., Clavelle, T., Strauss, C.K., Hilborn, R., Melnychuk, M. …Leland, A. (2016). Global Fishery Prospects Under Contrasting Management Regimes. PNAS, 113 (18), 5125–5129.

Costello, C., Gaines, S.,& Lynham, J. (2008). Can Catch Shares Prevent Fisheries Collapse? Science, 321: 1678-1681.

Fulton, E.A., Smith, A.D.M., Smith, D.C., & Putten, I.E.V. (2011). Human Behavior: The Key Source of Uncertainty in Fisheries Management. Fish and Fisheries 12: 2-17.

Grafton, R.Q., Arnason, R., Bjørndal, T., Campbell, D., Campbell, H.F., Clark, C.W., … Weninger, Q. (2006). Incentive-Based Approaches to Sustainable Fisheries. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63: 699–710.

Griffith, D.R. (2008). The ecological implications of individual fishing quotas and harvest cooperatives. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6,191–198.

Grimm, D., Barkhorn, I., Festa, D., Bonzon, K., Boomhower, J., Hovland, V., & Blau, J. (2012). Assessing catch shares’ effects evidence from Federal United States and associated British Columbian Fisheries. Marine Policy, 36, 644–657.

Kohlbacher, F. (2005). The Use of Qualitative Content Analysis in Case Study Research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research,7(1), Art. 21. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0601211. Accessed on 23 October 2016.

Melnychuk, M.C., Essington, T.E., Branch, T.A., Heppell, S.S., Jensen, O.P., Link, J.S., … Smith, A.D.M. (2012). Can catch share fisheries better track management targets? Fish and Fisheries13:267-290.

Novaczek, I, Harkes, I.H.T., Sopacua J., & Tatuhey, M.D.D. (2001). An Institutional Analysis of Sasi Laut in Maluku, Indonesia. Penang: International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management. 327p.

Ovando, D.A., Deacon, R.T., Lester, S.E., Costello, C., Leuvan, T.V., McIlwain, K., … Uchida, H. (2013). Conservation incentives and collective choices in cooperative fisheries. Marine Policy37: 132–140.

RBFM Interest Group Indonesia. (2016). Perikanan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia: Peran Hak Pengelolaan Ikan. Pelengkap Kertas Diskusi: Lembar Informasi #1 Isu-Isu Kunci. 4p.

Waddell, S. (2012). Property rights for natural resources management in Indonesia – have they been ruled unconstitutional? Indonesian Law Review (2):65-89.

Wahyono, A., Patji, A.R., Laksono, D.S., Indrawasih, R., Sudiyono, & Ali, S. (2000). Hak Ulayat Laut di Kawasan Timur Indonesia, Media Presindo, Yogyakarta.

Willard, D. (2016). Fishing Rights Case Study: Development of TURF Management in Chile. Unpublished manuscript.

Williams, M.J., & Staples, D. (2010). Southeast Asian Fisheries. In Grafton, R.Q., Hilborn, R., Squires, D., Tait, M., & Williams, M.J. (Eds.) Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management. (pp. 243-257). Oxford University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15578/jkpi.9.1.2017.11-20


Creative Commons License
Jurnal Kebijakan Perikanan Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
p-ISSN 1979-6366
e-ISSN 2502-6550

Crossref logoSHERPA/RoMEO Logogoogle scholardoaj