ANALISIS TINDAKAN SOSIAL DALAM PEMBANGUNAN SENTRA KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN TERPADU DI SABANG

Armen Zulham, Rani Hafsaridewi, Freshty Yulia Arthatani, Mira Mira

Abstract


Tindakan sosial adalah perilaku pelaku usaha perikanan terhadap pelaku lain dengan tujuan dan motivasi tertentu. Permasalahannya, tindakan sosial pelaku usaha pada kawasan Sentra Kelautan dan Perikanan Terpadu (SKPT) Sabang tidak responsif mendukung beroperasinya SKPT Sabang. Tujuan tulisan ini mempelajari karakteristik aspek sosial budaya masyarakat perikanan Sabang serta tindakan sosial yang terkait dengan hal itu agar SKPT Sabang dapat berfungsi. Data dan informasi diperoleh dari Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Observasi langsung (aktuelles verstehen), dan pemahaman motif tindakan (eklarendes verstehen) digunakan sebagai teknik untuk mendalami infomasi hasil FGD tersebut. Pengumpulan data dilakukan pada Oktober 2018. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan: tindakan sosial tradisional mendominasi keputusan pelaku usaha dalam penangkapan ikan. Pelaku usaha perikanan tersebut harus taat hukum adat laot yang dipantau Panglima Laot; tindakan sosial rasional instrumental mendominasi tindakan pelaku usaha pada kegiatan penanganan hasil tangkapan serta distribusi dan pemasaran ikan. Motif tindakan sosial yang terakhir ini mempengaruhi pelaku usaha lain, agar pasokan ikan dapat diperoleh atau mengoptimalkan manfaat karena tindakan pelaku usaha lain. Tulisan ini merekomendasikan agar di SKPT Sabang dilakukan perubahan sosial melalui transformasi 30% - 40% dari 684 unit armada perikanan <3 GT menjadi armada >10 GT. Transformasi ini akan mendorong tindakan sosial pada trip penangkapan ikan, peningkatan permintaan tenaga kerja trampil (pawang) dan penggunaan teknologi dalam penanganan serta pemasaran/distribusi ikan.

Social action is defined as the action among business actors for specific purposes or motives. The problem of social action in the SKPT (integrated marine and fisheries center) Sabang is that the business actors in fisheries are not responsive to support the operationalization of SKPT Sabang. The purpose of this paper is to learn the characteristics of business actors on socio-cultural aspects and social action to support the daily operation of SKPT Sabang. Data and information were collected from the Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Direct observation (aktuelles verstehen) and Empathetic Understanding (eklarendes verstehen) were used as techniques to collect advanced information. Data were collected in October 2018. The research findings are: traditional social actions dominate fishing actors’ activities. The business actors remain to obey on the local traditional rule (adat laot rule) observed by Panglima Laot; instrumental rational social actions are always carried out by business actors on the post-harvest fishing activities as well as distribution and fish marketing. The last social action motives are to influence others to provide fish and to reach optimal benefit due to other business actor action. This paper recommends preparing the social change through transformation 30% - 40% of < 3 GT fishing vessel to > 10 GT in Sabang. It will then change the duration of fishing activity, increase demand for skilled labor (pawang), and the application of technology in post-harvest as well as marketing/fish distribution.


Keywords


Perikanan laut; perairan Sabang; tindakan sosial; aspek sosial budaya

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anonim. (1992). Keputusan Pertemuan Panglima Laot / Musyawarah Panglima Laot Se Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Aceh. Tanggal 23 – 25 Januari 1992, di Langsa Aceh Timur (p. 66). Dinas Perikanan Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Aceh.

Berger, P.L., & T. Luckmann. (1991). The Social Construction of Reality A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. (p. 125). Penguin Books. Printed in England by Clays Ltd, St lves plc.

BPS Kota Sabang. (2018). Sabang dalam Angka 2017. (p. 270). Badan Pusat Statistik Sabang.

Budowski, M., & R. Tillmann. (2013). Social stratification. in A.C. Michalos (eds). Encyclopedia of quality of life research. (p. 4). Springer Science Business Media Dordrecht.

Damsar & Indrayani. (2013). Sosiologi ekonomi. (p. 317). Jakarta. Kencana Prenada Media.

Ditjen Perikanan Budidaya. (2016). Bisnis plan Sentra Kelautan dan Perikanan Terpadu, Kota Sabang. (p. 135). Jakarta – KKP.

Ditjen Perencanaan Ruang Laut. (2017). Master plan Sentra Kelautan dan Perikanan Terpadu, Kota Sabang. (p 189). Jakarta - KKP.

de Lange, G. (2017). Understand prescriptive analytics in 20 minutes. (pp. 16). AIMMS.

Connecting Business & Optimization.

Ferris, Kerry., & J. Stein. (2010). The real world an introduction to sociology. 2nd ed. (p. 98). New York: W.W. Norton.

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. The University of Chicago Press. American Journal of Sociology. (91), 3, 481-510.

Granovetter, M. (1995). The economic sociology of firm and entrepreneur, in A. Portes (ed.). The Economic Sociology of Immigration. (p. 213). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.

Huisman, D.O. (2015). To what extend do predictive, descriptive and prescriptive supply chain analytics affect organization performance?. 5th IBA thesis conference 2 July 2015. (p. 8). The Faculty of Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences. Univ. Twente. Netherland

Heaney, B. (2015). Supply chain intelligence: descriptive, Prescriptive and Predictive Optimization. (p. 17). ABERDEEN GROUP. A Harte Hank Company.

Hodgson, G.M. (1998). The approach of institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature. (36)1, 166-192.Download from: http://links.jstor.org/ sici?sici=00220515%28199803%2936% 3A1%3C166% 3ATAOIE%3E2.0.CO%3 B2-Q

Johnson, D.P. (1994). Teori sosiologi klasik dan modern - jilid 2. (p. 96). Jakarta. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Jones, P., Bradbury, L., & Boutilleir, S.L. (2016). Pengantar teori-teori sosial. (p. 86). Jakarta, Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Jackie, O., P. Tanpichai., & A. Jai-aree. (2018). Construction of social space in Thai hill tribe ethnic groups in Kamphaeng Phet province. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. (30), 1- 7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.019

Kepmen KP No. 51/KEPMEN-KP/2016. (2016). Penetapan lokasi pembangunan sentra kelautan dan perikanan terpadu di Pulau-Pulau Kecil dan Kawasan Perbatasan. Biro Hukum, KKP

Kepmen KP No. 50/KEPMEN-KP/2017. (2017). Estimasi potensi, jumlah tangkapan yang diperbolehkan, dan tingkat pemanfaatan sumber daya ikan di wilayah pengelolaan perikanan Negara Republik Indonesia. Biro Hukum, KKP.

Lim, B.T.H., & M. Loosemore. (2016). How socially responsible is construction business in Australia and New Zealand?. Procedia Engineering 180 (p. 531–540). International High- Performance Built Environment Conference – A Sustainable Built Environment Conference 2016 Series (SBE16), iHBE.

Martono, N. (2014). Sosiologi perubahan sosial persfektif klasik, moderen. Posmoderen dan poskolonial. (p. 419). Jakarta Rajagrafindo Persada.

Matuschke, I. (2008). Evaluating the impact of social networks in rural innovation systems: An overview. The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC. (p. 26). IFPRI Discussion Paper 00816.

Mooney, L. A., Knox, D., & Schacht, C. (2000). Understanding Social Problems. 2nd ed. (p. 285). Cincinnati, OH: Wadsworth.

Oyedokun, G. E. (2016). Management Thoughts: The Review of Social Action Theory. Article in SSRN Electronic Journal · January 2016 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2912274. down load from: https://www.researchgate.net /publication/317995900. 10 March 2018.

Pretty, J. (1995). Regenerative agriculture: policy and practice for sustainability and self reliance. London, Earthscan. Dalam R. Ramirez (eds) 1995. Participatory learning and communication approaches for managing pluralism. http://www.fao.org/document/show_cdr.asp? url_file =DOCREP/W8827E/w8827e08.htm. down load 10 Oct 1018.

Pinker, S. (1998). How the mind works. (p. 660). Penguin Books. London

Priya, R. (2013). Weber 4 ideal types of social action. http://www.yourarticle library .com /sociology/types-of-social-action-according-to-max-weber/43755/

Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. (p. 86). New York. Free Press.

Poloma, M.M. (2007). Sosiologi kontemporer. (p. 98). Jakarta. RadjaGrafindo Persada.

Ravikumar, T., N. Ram., S. Dam-Roy., P. Krishnan., Grinson-George., M. Sankaran, V. Sachithanandam. (2015). Traditional usages of ichthyotoxic plant Barringtonia asiatica (L.) Kurz. by the Nicobari tribes. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures (4), 76–80.

Ravikumar, T., N. Ram., P. Krishnan., R. K. Sankar., V. Sachithanandam., S. D. Roy. (2016). Subsistence fishing methods of Nicobari tribes using traditional knowledge. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures (5), 79–87.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imic. 2016.05.002

Rohmaida, F.N., & Utami, D. (2016). Tindakan sosial penggunaan uang “ganti rugi” petani tambak pasca alih fungsi lahan di Desa Manyar Sidorukun Kecamatan Manyar Kabupaten Gresik. Paradigma. (4)3, 1-12.

Riss, I. (2016). Typology of social actions based on the living system theory. Download from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319330486. (12 January 2019).

Samuels, W.J. (1995). The present state of institutional economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics (19), 569-590

Sanderson, S.K. (2010). Makro sosiologi: sebuah pendekatan terhadap realitas sosial. (p. 105). PT RajaGrafindo Persada. Jakarta.

Supraja, M. (2012). Alfred Schutz: Rekonstruksi Teori Tindakan Max Weber. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi. (1) 2, 81-90.

Thomson, K. (2017). Max weber’s social action theory. Down load from https://revisesociology .com /2017/01/26/max-webers-social-action-theory/. (3 Feb. 2019).

Trueman, C.N. (2015). Social action theory. (p. 6). Download from http:// historylearning site.co.uk. (5 April 2019).

Weber, M. (1964). The theory of social and economic organization. (p. 94). The Free Press. A Division of Simon & Schuster Inc. New York.

Wyatt-Nichol, H., S. Brown., & W. Haynes. (2011). Social class and socioeconomic status: Relevance and Inclusion in MPA-MPP Programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education. (17)2,187–208.Download from http://www.naspaa.org/JPAEMessenger/index_2011spring.asp

Zulham, A., Subaryono., & Anggawangsa, R. F. (2017). Rekomendasi pengembangan perikanan tangkap di natuna dan sekitarnya. (p.66). Depok. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Zulham, A. (2018). Penilaian sosial dalam membangun entitas bisnis perikanan pada SKPT Selat Lampa, Natuna. J. Kebijakan Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan. (8), 1, 77 - 90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15578/jksekp.v8i1.7102




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15578/jkpi.11.2.2019.113-123


Creative Commons License
Jurnal Kebijakan Perikanan Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
p-ISSN 1979-6366
e-ISSN 2502-6550

Crossref logoSHERPA/RoMEO Logogoogle scholardoaj