KINERJA EKSPOR UDANG INDONESIA DI AMERIKA SERIKAT TAHUN 2009-2017: PENDEKATAN MODEL CONSTANT MARKET SHARE (CMS)
Abstract
tahun 2009 hingga tahun 2017 yang diperoleh dari United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Division (UN Comtrade) dan International Trade Center (ITC:).Rata-rata pertumbuhan ekspor udang Indonesia
secara umum lebih tinggi daripada rata-rata pertumbuhan ekspor udang dunia. Kinerja ekspor udang beku lebih baik dibanding udang segar dan udang olahan, dilihat dari aspek efek komposisi produk dan dan efek daya saing, namun dari aspek efek distribusi udang beku dan udang segar kalah dibanding dengan udang olahan. Hasil tersebut menunjukkan bahwa udang beku Indonesia memiliki potensi yang sangat besar untuk dikembangkan, walaupun dari aspek distribusi masih lemah (ditunjukkan dengan nilai yang bertanda negatif). Hasil CMS menunjukkan bahwa ekspor udang Indonesia masih berfokus pada udang beku saja, dan kurang memprioritaskan udang segar dan udang olahan. Hal tersebut
menunjukkan bahwa perlu adanya evaluasi baik dari sisi produksi, distribusi dan mutu produk untuk meningkatkan kinerja produk terutama di udang segar maupun olahan.
Title: Export Performance of Indonesian Shrimp In the United States During 2009-2017: A Constant Market Share Model Approach
Export is an important sector to calculate the economic growth of the country. Shrimp is one of main commodity that gives significant contribution to Indonesia economic. The research was aimed
at analyzing the export performance of Indonesian shrimp in the United States during 2009-2017. Specifically, the shrimps were grouped into three categories, frozen shrimp, fresh shrimp, and processed shrimp. Constant Market Share (CMS) approach was used in this study. This study used secondary data from 2009 to 2017 that were collected from the United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Division (UN Comtrade) and International Trade Center (ITC). The average growth of Indonesia shrimp was higher than the average growth of the world shrimp exports. The result of CMS suggested that export performance of frozen shrimp was better than the fresh shrimp and processed shrimp based on product composition and competitiveness effect. However, processed shrimp was better than frozen shrimp and fresh shrimp in terms of distribution effect. The result showed that Indonesia shrimp exports were still focused only on frozen shrimp rather than fresh shrimp and processed shrimp. Frozen shrimp had a great potential of development despite of its poor distribution (negative value). This phenomenon suggested a necessary evaluation on the production, distribution, and product quality to improve the product performance especially on fresh shrimp and processed shrimp.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aisya, L.K., Sari, Y.D., & Koeshendrajana, S. (2006). Pola Perdagangan Internasional Ekspor Udang Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Perikanan Indonesia, Vol 1 (1): 49-65.
Asbiantari, D. R., Hutagaol, M. P., & Asmara, A. (2016). Pengaruh Ekspor Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pembangunan, Vol 5 (2): 10-31.
Ashari, U., Sahara, S., & Hartoyo, S. (2016). Daya Saing Udang Segar Dan Udang Beku Indonesia Di Negara Tujuan Ekspor Utama. Jurnal Manajemen dan Agribisnis, Vol 13: 1-13.
Basri, F. & Munandar, H. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Ekonomi Internasional:Pengenalan dan Aplikasi Metode Kuantitatif. Kencana Prenada Media Group. Jakarta.
Batista, J. C. (2008). Competition between Brazil and other exporting countries in the US import market: a new extension of constant-market-shares analysis. Applied Economics, Vol 40: 2477-2487.
[DJPT] Direktorat Jendral Perikanan Budi daya. (2016). Indonesia Raja Udang ASEAN. Retrieved from http://djpb.kkp.go.id/index.php/arsip/c/421/INDONESIA-RAJA-UDANG-ASEAN/?category_id=33. (Diakses 22 Maret 2019).
Dore, I. (2010). SHRIMP Supply, Products and Marketing in the Aquaculture Age. Toms River, New Jersey: Urner Barry Publications, Inc. (OECD) Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and
Development. 2003. Liberalising Fisheries Markets Scope and Effects. 75775 Paris Cedex 16. Perancis.
Fagerberg, J. & Sollie, G. (2006). The Method Of Constant Market Shares Analysis Reconsidered. Applied Economics, Vol 19: 1571-1583.
[FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization. (2018).
Globefish Highlights A Quarterly Update on World
Seafood Markets. Retrieved from http://www.fao.
org/publications. (Diakses 7 September 2018).
Huang, D.T.R.L.W.Y.L. (2014). Study on the Survival of China Agrifood Export Trade Relathionship. China Agricultural Economic Review, Vol 6 (20): 1-10.
[ITC] International Trade Center. (2018). Harmonized System Revisions Correspondences. Retrieved from https://trademap.org/Bilateral_10D_TS.aspx. (Diakses 14 November 2018).
[ITC] International Trade Center. (2018). Extract Data.
Retrieved from https://www.trademap.org/Index.aspx. (Diakses 20 November 2018).
Johnson, H. M. (2004). Annual Report on the United States Seafood Industry 12th Edition. Jacksonville. Oregon, United States of America.
Juarno, O. (2012). Daya Saing dan Strategi Peningkatan Ekspor Udang Indonesia di Pasar Internasional. Disertasi. Sekolah Pascasarjana. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Program Studi Ilmu Ekonomi Pertanian. Bogor.
[Kemendag] Kementerian Perdagangan. (2011). HS Code. Retrieved from http://djpen.kemendag. go.id/app_frontend/links/98-hs-code. (Diakses, 10 November 2018).
[Kemendag] Kementerian Perdagangan. (2019). Negara
Tujuan Ekspor 10 Komoditi Utama. Retrieved from.http://www.kemendag.go.id/id/economic-profile/10-main-and-potential-commodities/10-main-commodities. (Diakses, 10 November 2018).
[KKP] Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan. (2018). Produktivitas Perikanan Indonesia. Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta.
Lem, A. (2006). An Overview of Global Shrimp Markets and Trade. In Leung and C. Engle (Eds). Shrimp Culture: Economics, Market, and Trade. Blackwell Publishing, Ames. United States of America.
Mo, Y. (2017). 3 Jenis Udang Komoditas Ekspor Terunggul Indonesia. Retrieved from https:// www.isw.co.id/single-post/2017/02/04/3-JenisUdang-Komoditas-Ekspor-Terunggul-Indonesia (Diakses 12 Desember 2018). National Marine
Fisheries Service. (2018). NMFS Trade Query - Single Product By Country. Retrieved from https://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/commercial-fisheries/.(Diakses 12 Desember 2018).
[OECD] Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2003). Liberalising Fisheries Markets Scope and Effects. 75775 Paris Cedex 16. Perancis.
Ongsritrakul, S. & Hubbard, L. (1996). The Export Market For Thai Frozen Shrimps In The European Union. British Food Journal, Vol 98: 24-28.
Pusat Data, Statistik, dan Informasi. (2013). Buku Statistik 2012 Kelautan dan Perikanan. Kementrian Kelautan dan Perikanan. Jakarta.
Pusat Data, Statistik, dan Informasi. (2016). Informasi Kelautan Dan Perikanan. Kementrian Kelautan dan Perikanan. Jakarta.
Pusat Data, Statistik, dan Informasi. (2018). Produksi Perikanan Dan Kelautan Satu Data - Kementerian Kelautan Dan Perikanan. Kementrian Kelautan dan Perikanan. Retrieved from https://kkp.go.id/ setjen/satudata (Diakses 12 Desember 2018).
Reily, M. (2018). Indonesia Berpotensi Jadi Eksportir Udang Terbesar Dunia. Retrieved from https:// katadata.co.id/berita/2018/03/28/indonesia-berpotensi-jadi-eksportir-udang-terbesar-dunia. (Diakses 7 September 2018).
Saptanto, S. (2011). Daya Saing Ekspor Produk Perikanan Indonesia di Lingkup ASEAN dan ASEAN-China. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan, Vol 6 (1): 51-60.Sekakela, K. (2016). The Impact of trading with China on Botswana’s economy.
Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, Vol 9: 2-23.
Simonis, D. (2000). Export performance in Eastern Europe. 40th Congress of the European Regional Science Association 26th Meeting of Regional Studies of the Spanish Association of Regional
Science European Monetary Union and regional Policy. Barcelona.
Singh, K. & M. M. Dey. (2011). International Competitiveness Of Catfish In The U.S. Market: A Constant Market Share Analysis. Aquaculture Economics & Management, Vol 15 (3): 214-229.
Suprihartini, R. (2005). Daya Saing Ekspor The Indonesia di Pasar Teh Dunia. Jurnal Agroekonomi, Vol 15: 16-19
Tarman, Kartikawati, D., Widodo, H., Fakhrudin, U., Muna, N., & Bambang, S. W. (2011). Kajian Kebijakan Pengembangan Diversifikasi Pasar dan Produk Ekspor. Laporan Akhir. Pusat Kebijakan Perdagangan Luar Negeri Badan Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Kebijakan Perdagangan. Jakarta.
The United Nation Commodity Trade. (2018). Extract Data. Retrieved from https://comtrade.un.org/ data/. (Diakses, 20 November 2018).
Tyres, R., Philips, P. & In Lim, D. (1985). ASEAN-Australia Trade in Manufactures: Constant Market Share Analysis, 1970-1979. In Lim, D. (ed.). ASEANAustralia Trade in Manufactures. Longman
Chesire, Melrborne. Australia.
Wang, Z.-X., Zheng, H.-H., Pei, L.-L., & Jin, T. (2017). Decomposition Of The Factors Influencing Export Fluctuation In China’s New Energy Industry Based On A Constant Market Share Model. Energy Policy, Vol 109: 22-35.
Widodo, H., Simanjuntak, Y., Siswanti, T.P., Fakhrudin, U., Hasni, Mulyati, S., Rakiman, Mulatsih, S., & Asmara, A. (2008). Kajian Pengembangan Pasar Ekspor Produk Makanan Olahan.Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perdagangan Luar Negeri. Departemen Perdagangan. Jakarta
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15578/jsekp.v15i1.7677
Indexed by:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Published by
Research Center for Marine and Fisheries Socio-Economic
in collaboration with
Indonesian Marine and Fisheries Socio-Economics Research Network
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.